Sir F. Rogers
This is not the first time
M Cox has appealed to this office to
obtain her Allowance from her husband. He is a Gold Comm &
Member of Council for
Cariboo District.
In
Nov 1862 she wrote saying that her husband who had left her &
emigrated to
B. Columbia had promised to remit to her 1/2 his
Salary—but had
failed to do so. Her appeal was sent to the
Gov
who was instructed to inform
M Cox that unless he could refute
the statement that he had left his wife without means of assistance
he must either provide for his Wife out of his Salary or be removed
from his app.
The
Gov was again written to on the
7 July 1863 no report
having been
rec & he was told "you will see that
M Cox does
not trifle with this matter," & will inform
M Cox that
unless he made his remittances punctually he was to be dismissed.
In answer the
Gov stated that
M Cox had already made
remittances to his Wife & that in justice to
M Cox he must say he
had always found him a correct, honorable & useful officer.
On the
4 Dec 1863 a further despatch reported that
M Cox had
stated that he was prepared to allow his Wife £60 a year & had
already made some remittances to her on that account.
M Cox now states that she has only
rec £14.15.9 this
year.
As
M Cox has since
1863 apparently regularly made his
promised remittances, & possibly he is one of those unfortunate
officers who are in arrear of Salary, I think it
w be sufficient
to send a copy of the present appeal to the
Gov to be sent to
M Cox?