No. 2
New Westminster
1st February 1868
My Lord Duke,
With reference to my despatch No. 146 of the 22nd November 1867, I feel compelled to make some additional remarks respecting Mr Waddington's project of opening a roadfromManuscript image from the Pacific at Bute Inlet to the frontiers of Canada. I am told that he has been lecturing with some success on the subject in Canada. It is therefore my duty to say, although I should be glad to see Capitalists spend their money in the Colony, that I believe the line proposed by Mr Waddington is about the worst that could have been selected. I may mention in supportofManuscript image of this assertion that the New Westminster Volunteers when in persuit [sic] of the Chilicoten murderers found themselves unable to penetrate to the Interior by way of Bute Inlet but reached the centre of the Colony when Bentinck Arm was taken as a point of departure.
I have the honor to be,
My Lord Duke,
Your most obedient, humble
Frederick Seymour
Minutes by CO staff
Manuscript image
Sir F. Rogers
Very doubtful whether anything more will be heard of Mr Waddington & his project.
Should this & 1204 be ackn: saying that they will not be lost sight of should his Grace receive any formal & specific project in writing from Mr Waddington. His Grace saw him.
CC 3/4
Manuscript image
This is killing the slain I conceive. But the argt is not conclusive. It may be that a line of route absolutely impracticable to men & horses as it stands may be made practicable to carriages by a trifling expenditure of money, while a route practicable for men and horses as it stands may require enormous sums to make it practicable for carriages. Ansr as proposed.
Manuscript image
Simply ack?
CBA 7/4
Manuscript image
B&C 9/4
Other documents included in the file
Manuscript image
Draft reply, Buckingham to Seymour, No. 23, 14 April 1868 acknowledging Seymour’s despatches regarding Waddington’s proposed road project from the Pacific Ocean to Canada.