I have been for some time considering whether it was not my duty
               to forward you the enclosed copy of a letter received by my
               Solicitors from the Gentlemen, acting as Solicitors to the
               
Society for the Propagation of the Gospel and I presume also for
               The Trustees to the Colonial Bishopricks Fund. It struck me
               as a most singular, not to say unparalled suggestion that a
               Crown Dependency Would probably & that shortly "select a
               Sovereign power for itself," and that any deed which a
               British Subject may be called upon to execute,

 Should be
               framed with a consideration to such a contingency; most
               certainly it is a position totally alien to any I contemplated
               when I provided Emoluments in English Colonies to which
               arrangement the whole of the Archbishops & Bishops of the
               Church were parties and which was satisfied by the Crown.
               In consequence of the illness of the 
Archbishop of Canterbury
               I have been unable to communicate with him and I
               am therefore unaware whether the letter from the
               Solicitors of the Society at 77 Pall Mall has come under His
               Graces

 Notice. I however thought it possible that they might be
               aware of some intention on the part of the Government to give
               up 
British Columbia.
               
               The recent debate in Parliament and the answer
               given by the Home
               Secretary to a Deputation, which visited upon him upon the
               subject of Emigration seems to negative such a supposition, and
               I think it therefore right to place the subjoined copy of the
               letter in your hands. The actual subject under discussion
               relates to the establishment of the Archdeacouries
               
               of 
British Columbia and the question is, with whom the
               the reversionary interest should

 rest.
               
               Whether with me and my heirs or with the 
Soc for the
                  Propagation of the Gospel, Should the object Fail, which I
               had in view when I provided the Emoluments, which object was
               set forward in the Declaration of Lambeth in 
1843 by the
               Archbishop & Bishops and subsequently received the approbation
               of the Queen in Council—but it is not to discussions on account
               of this, that I am induced to place this letter in Your
               Lordships hands, but that I have been so much impressed with the
               very unusual contingency set before me, by persons representing
               Individuals holding high State offices that it has scarcely
               seemed to me right not to communicate its contents to you.