M Hawes
I forward once more the grant of
Vancouver's Island. What I now propose (since consulting with
Sir J. Stephen on the subject) is, to omit all
notice whatever of the grant of
Rupert's Land and to make no grant to
the Company of anything beyond the
land of
the Island. The reason is that the power of the Crown in
these days to make a grant like Charles 2
and to transfer to the
Company the right of governing British subjects is to say the least very
questionable. I should therefore suggest (if the Company accept these
terms) that a simple Commission & Instructions should be issued as
nearly contemporaneous with the grant as may be to any governor whom the
Company may chose to appoint with the Crown's sanction, empowering
him
to govern & make laws with the advice of an assembly of inhabitants.
This
Sir J. Stephen considers perfectly legal. But this Governor must
be responsible, not to the Company but to the
Sec of State. Nothing
short of an Act of Parl can make this otherwise.
The clause which I have marked N 1. seems to me very
insufficient as a legal instrument to bind the Company,
but I do not see how this would be practicable where the subject is of so very general
and loose a nature, & probably the object will be attained by making it
publicly a part of the grant.
The clause I have marked N 2. is also a novelty: I have not
been able to find any precedent.