Molesworth writes to Douglas to request a report on the circumstances and date of the British occupation of the Island of San Juan, and to address an apparent contradiction in Douglas's previous correspondence on the same topic, which mentioned an outrage committed by American Citizens in the Canal de Arro.
No. 2
Downing Street
13th August 1855
Sir,
I have to acknowledge your Despatches No 5 of the 18th May
last and No 7 of 12th June last on the subject of an outrage
committed by American Citizens in the Canal de Arro; which I have
communicated to the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, with a
request that theircontents contents may be taken into immediate consideration.
2. I wish, however, to call your attention to a question of some
importance which appears to arise on these papers.
3. In your Despatch of the 24th November 1853, on the subject of
the boundary question in the Canal do Arro, you expressed it to be your
intention that these Islands should
remain a de facto dependency of Vancouver's Island unoccupied by
any Settlement of Whites, except a Fishing Station, whichwas was
established some years ago by the Hudson's Bay Company on the Island of San Juan,
an intention which appears to Her Majesty's Government judicious; the
question of boundary being still unsettled, however just the ground
which you might have for asserting the British right.
4. But Mr Griffin in his letter, accompanying your present despatch of May 18th, says
When I first established myself here, 15th November 1853, I was
given explicitly to understandby by your Excellency, that this was British
Territory, and that I should be protected by my Country from all Foreign
aggressors.
And he appears to have entered on agricultural operations on the Island
of San Juan accordingly.
5. I cannot reconcile these two statements, and have to instruct
you to furnish a more detailed report of the circumstances and date of
the British occupation of the Island of San Juan.
I have the honor to be Sir,
Your most obedient humble servant
W. Molesworth