Despatch to London.
Minutes (1), Enclosures (untranscribed) (1), Other documents (1).
Douglas clarifies earlier erroneous statements on the effects of the Bonding System in Californian Ports and US customs duties, respectively, on articles imported into Vancouver's Island.Douglas emphasizes that he was desirous of explaining the nature of our trade with San Francisco, and its effects financially on the Colonies of Vancouver's Island and British Columbia.
No. 59
24 November 1859
I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your Grace's
Despatch of the 3rd September last No 9 relative to the
existence of the Bonding System in Californian Ports, and
transmitting for my information the copy of a letter which has
been received on the subjectsubject from the Foreign Office.
2. Your Grace also furnishes me with the Copy of a letter upon
the same subject from the Board of Trade and instructs me to afford an explanation concerning the statement made in my
Despatch of the 23rd March last, that articles imported into
Vancouver's Island are
"necessarily" charged with the Customs duties levied in that State.
3. The passage in my Despatch alluded to I find to be as
follows—"These goods (the imports from California) areare necessarily
burdened with the Customs and municipal duties levied in
California forming a charge of nearly 30 per cent on their first
cost."
And I must express my sincere regret that the somewhat defective
nature of the statement therein contained as to goods
"necessarily" being charged with "Customs duties"
should have conveyed an impression which was erroneous, and
contrary to my intention.
4. I was fully aware when compiling that Despatch that the
BondingBonding System did exist in California, but I have every reason
to believe that, from various circumstances, the bulk of the
goods imported from California up to the period at which I wrote
were not purchased in Bond but were
actually burdened with Customs Duties. It however unquestionably
did not follow that that impost should
"necessarily" continue to be attached to them, and I should
therefore have been more exact had I expressed myself thus
"Those goods are necessarily burdened, with the
municipal duties and hitherto
in most casescases with the customs duty in addition
levied in California, thus forming a charge of 30 per cent on
their first cost."
5. The principal object I had in view when writing the Despatch
in question was to attract attention to a matter of vital
importance to this Colony. I was desirous of explaining the
nature of our trade with San Francisco, and its effects
financially on the Colonies of Vancouver's Island and British
Columbia; and of showing that the produce and manufactures ofof
Great Britain and other Countries could if brought direct from
the first market be imported at a less rate by 30 percent than
articles obtained from San Francisco; and that conclusion is I
believe substantially correct.
I forward herewith for your Grace's information a statement
presenting in detail the data upon which my conclusions were
founded, and I trust that the same may not prove uninteresting to
your Grace.
II have etc.
Minutes by CO staff
Mr Merivale
Copy to the Bd of Trade with reference to their Letter of the
25th of last August.
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
"Statement, Showing the Charges on Goods imported from England
and other countries in Europe into the Port of San Francisco;
and the rate of advance on first cost at which such goods are
generally Sold by the Merchants of that place," with
explanation, 1 March 1859, signed by Joseph Porter, Accountant.