Public Offices document.
Minutes (2), Marginalia (2).
Murdoch addresses complexities of the reservation of Land as requested by Douglas and the House of Assembly, respectively, on Vancouver Island. Murdoch lists specific land-reserve types from the Land Sales Act of 1842, which includes for the use or benefit of the aboriginal inhabitants of the Country, and he asserts that any land reserves should not be used as a means of raising an income for any establishment or person.
I have to acknowledge your letter of 21st instant enclosing the
extract of a Despatch from the Governor of VanCouvers Island, on the
subject of communications which have passed between him and the House
of Assembly of that Island, relative to the reservation by the
Government of Crown Lands in the several Districts of the Colony.
2. The House of Assembly, it appears, had requested the
Governor to make reserves in certain DistrictsDistricts of 100 acres for
educational and 100 acres for public purposes—and the Governor in
answer informed the House that he had instructed the Surveyor General
"to make large reserves for the general purposes of Government" in
certain districts which he named. To this, however, the Assembly
objected on the ground that large reserves are prejudicial to a
Colony, and that endowments in Land for religious Establishments are
objectionable—and they requested that (as I understand their
meaning) Reserves should be made only to the extent and for the
purposes suggestedsuggested by them, and that no reserves should in any case
be sold or otherwise disposed of except with the consent of the
Legislature. The Governor informed the House that it was not in his
power to comply literally with their request, but that he would
recommend it for the favorable consideration of H.M. Government. In
the Despatch of which an Extract is enclosed in your letter he
describes the claim advanced by the Assembly as unconstitutional and
an encroachment on the rights of the Crown.
3. So long as the control over the Waste Land remains in the handshands
of the Crown, it is for the Crown or its representative to decide
what reserves may be necessary for public purposes. And in a young
Colony it would not be advisable to lay down any narrow or inelastic
rule, either as to the extent of the reserves which should be made or
the purposes to which they should be applied. At the same time there
is much truth in the objection of the House of Assembly, that
extensive reserves are prejudicial, inasmuch as they interrupt
communications & interfere with the concentration of the
population—andand they have been invariably found an objectionable form
of endowment for religious establishments in the Colonies.
Parliament specified the objects for which reserves might be made as
follows:
For public Roads or other internal communications whether by Land or
water—or for the use or benefit of the aboriginal inhabitants of the
Country—or for purposes of military defence—or as the sites of
places for public Worship, schools or other public Buildings—or as
places for the interment of the dead—or places for the recreation
and amusement of the inhabitants of any Town or Village—or as the
sitessites of public Quays or landing places on the Sea Coast or Shores of
Navigable Streams—or for any other purpose of public safety,
convenience, health or enjoyment.
This specification appears to furnish a very sufficient rule as to
the nature of the Reserves to be made in a new Colony. The general
principle is indicated in the concluding words of it—vizt—that
Reserves should be made for any public object requiring the use of
Land, but not for the purpose of raising
a Revenue either by its cultivation or by its sale at a future
period.
In
5. In regard to the request of the Assembly that no Reserves
should be used or disposed of except with the consent of the
Legislature, it would not be advisable to comply with it so long as
the management of the Crown Lands is retained in the hands of the
Executive Government. But the Governor would no doubt willingly
consider in any such matter any suggestions or recommendations which
he might receive from the Legislature.
6. If the Duke of Newcastle should concur in the above views I would
submit that the Governor should be informed that the Secretary of
State does not think itit desirable to restrict the reservation of Land
to the extent proposed by the House of Assembly, but that Reserves
should not be made beyond what the ascertained or highly probable
wants of the public service render necessary—and should not be used
as a means of raising an income for any establishment or person.
It might further be proper to state that the Secretary of State
approves of his having declined to accede to the requestrequest of the
Assembly that the Reserves should be dealt with only according to the
views of the Legislature.
I should therefore ackge the Governor's despatch, should inform
him of the facts stated in Par: 4 as to the purposes enumerated in
the Land Sales Act of 1842 as fit objects for reserves, and should
then answer in accordance with par: 6 of this report.