Despatch to London.
Minutes (2), Other documents (1).
Douglas provides Newcastle with a response to Samuel R. Heseltine's
request that he be given the salary he feels is owed to his son, Samuel J. Heseltine, who died while holding the position of
Steam Inspector to [the Government of Vancouver Island].Douglas argues
that Samuel J. Heseltine is not owed any pay, because his performance was poor. Colonial Office
staff disagree with Douglas in the minutes, replying that if Heseltine's performance was poor,
then Douglas should have dismissed him. Since he was not dismissed, he must be paid.
No. 59
10 September 1861
I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your Grace's despatch
No 55 of the 1st May,
forwarding a letter from Mr Heseltine
representing that a sum ofSixty
Sixty six Pounds, thirteen shillings and four pence (£66.13.4) was due at the time
of his decease to his late
son, on account of salary as Steam Inspector to this Government.
2. With reference to the above claim I have the honor to acquaint
your Grace, that Mr Heseltine
was appointed to the office of Inspecting Engineer as represented, but he
nevercompleted completed any one
single Act of the important duty it was intended he should perform,
altho' many times called upon to do so; alleging as a reason that he
was waiting until he could obtain apparatus suitable for testing the
peculiar boilers used on this coast. It would seem from a letter
addressed by him to the Harbour Master in reply to a Requisition for
a Report on the condition of theSteam Steam vessels, that he had been on
board most of them and had made a provisional inspection as he termed
it. No Certificates of the fact were however forthcoming, and I am
inclined to believe these provisional inspections consisted mainly in
using his reputed Office for the purpose of obtaining passages
backwards and forwards between this place and British Columbia, and
up the Fraser River, in the different steam vessels.
3. For
3. For these reasons I considered that
Mr Heseltine could not be
regarded as having any claim to a salary which was to be given for specific services
rendered, and it would almost
appear that Mr
Heseltine so regarded it himself, for he never preferred any claim.
4. At the time of Mr Heseltines
appointment, from the number of high pressure steam vessels running between these
Colonies, it was
highly desirable if notindispensable
indispensable as a necessary security to life and property that the Office of Inspecting
Engineer should be created.
Mr Heseltine was brought to my notice,
as a person possessing superior attainments as an Engineer both theoretically and
practically, of most respectable connections, and, in short, as the only thoroughly
qualified individual in the community. These
representations I have every reason to believe were
strictlycorrect correct,
but unfortunately he was also a person of dissolute and erratic
habits, and much given to inebriety. Of this I only became aware
after his death, but to these propensities unquestionably may be
attributed the non-performance of the duties of his Office.
I have the honor to be
My Lord Duke,
Your Grace's most obedient
humble Servant James Douglas
Minutes by CO staff
Mr Elliot
Copy to Mr Heseltine—who will probably not think this a sufficient
excuse for not paying a claim due to an Officer who had not been dismissed from his
situation.
That Mr Heseltine
was an undeserving person and that he rendered no
real service to the public, may be taken for granted on the Governors
report. But he was not hired on condition of working by the job. He
was engaged as some of the papers
shew
at a regular salary to fill an office from which the Governor neither
suspended nor removed him. I apprehend therefore that it is quite
inadmissible to refuse payment of the salary on the ground that he
was an unprofitable servant. This would have been a reason to
dismiss him, but not to withhold his pay whilst he retained his
capacity of a public servant.
I think therefore that we can by no means send a copy of this
Despatch to the Survivors. It is so insufficient that the Governor
might really be liable to legal proceedings. I should propose
instead to write out to him pointing out the true nature of the case.
Draft reply, Newcastle to Douglas, No. 75, 14 November 1861,
informing him that since Heseltine was not dismissed, the salary due at the time of his death should be paid to
his legal Representatives.