M Fortescue
These extra allowances to our Army and Navy in different parts of the
World, depending on no fixed rule either as to their amount or as to
the places where they are to be given or withheld, constitute an
anomaly of recent growth, and one which may sooner or later prove
very inconvenient. You are familiar with the subject on account of
your researches in the Committee of last Session. In India the
Troops always had double pay. In the Colonies (except Ceylon so
close as it is to India) neither Soldiers nor Sailors, so far as I am
aware, had any extra pay until the Gold discoveries in Australia.
Those created a demand which it was impossible to resist for
additional allowances. They were not only just in themselves, but
had they been refused, our forces might have melted away by
desertion. Afterwards the Troops got extra pay at the
Cape, and they have
it it likewise in some of the other Colonies.
As to the Navy they receive extra allowances from Colonial sources in
Australia, but I fear that we have no very clear account of their
rate, and I cannot at present remember an instance of extra allowances
to the Navy in other Colonies. In India I believe that they have
Batta as the Army has, and possibly in China during the War. But on
the subject of India I speak without accurate information.
If the Navy are to have extra allowances in any other Colonies
besides Australia, I suppose that the gold-producing regions of
British Columbia &
Vancouver's Island would have the best claim to
such an advantage, but you are aware that the public revenues of
those Colonies are small; and on the other hand I should hardly think
that Parliament could be asked to vote different rates of pay from
England for
the Queen's Forces afloat, being as
those those Forces are by
their very nature erratic and liable to be constantly moved from one
part of the world to another.
The more I think of it, the greater appear to me the general objections
to establishing extra allowances to the Navy. The plea in the case
of Soldiers was the extra expense of living in certain colonies. But
in the case of Sailors, victuals, clothes, even luxuries, are carried
about in the same ship with them, the first issuable as rations, the
other saleable to them at a fixed price: they have nothing to do
with their money on shore except to spend it, as unhappily the poor
fellows do, in boundless riot and extravagance. Local dearness
therefore does not affect Sailors as it does Soldiers.
I may also add that in an excellent report which I have seen of a
Departmental Committee, it is shown that the high price of living in
some Colonies compared with others has been greatly exaggerated.
Duke of Newcastle
The question must I think, be decided by the
Admiralty. It must,
however,
be admitted that
V. I at this moment affords the strongest
case, probably, that can be made out in any Colony for extra
allowances—and if the
Admiralty sh[ould] think that they are
necessary, or tell us that the Gunboats cannot be kept at
V. I
without them, I would give them, rather than deprive the two Colonies
of the invaluable services of these little vessels.