Public Offices document.
Minutes (2), Other documents (2).
Walcott sends the Colonial Office an analysis of, and response to,
Irving's complaint about the colonial government reducing land prices on Vancouver Island
after he had purchased land there. Walcott recommends that Irving be allowed to select 50 acres of his
allotment for the £50 he has actually paid, and that the government should relieve him from his liability to complete the rest of his contract.Colonial Office staff minute that Douglas should be consulted before any decisions
are made, since there are doubtless many purchasers of land in the Colony in the same position as
this Gentleman and all the cases should be treated alike.
I have to acknowledge your Letter of the 27th ultimo enclosing an
application from Mr John Irving to be allowed to give up certain
lands which he had purchased in Van Couvers Island and to receive
back the deposit he had paid for them.
2. It appears that in December 1859Mr Irving appliedto to purchase
200 acres in the North Saanich district at the then upset price of £1
an acre and obtained an allotment of 159 acres, on account of which
he paid down £50. Subsequently, at the instance of the House of
Assembly and Legislative Council, the price of Government Country
lands was (in February 1861) reduced to 4s/2d an acre.
3. Mr Irving pleads that this measure operates to the detriment of
purchasers at £1 an acre, and claims that the Government shouldrestore
restore the £50 he has paid, and resume the land.
4. It is plain that the reduction in the price of land must
injuriously affect the previous purchasers—nevertheless I do not see
how this claim can be admitted without establishing a principle and a
precedent of a wide application and pregnant with consequences
injurious to the public interests. If the application be granted
others could not be refused. The whole land transactions of the
Colony would thus become unsettled andthe the Colonial Government might
be involved in liabilities beyond its ability to meet.
5. In all dealings of this kind the purchaser, as it appears to me,
must be held to take the land under the circumstances of the moment,
and subject to the contingencies and implied conditions legitimately
attaching to it. One of these contingencies obviously is (especially
in a new Country) the liability to such changes in the land granting
system as the general welfare of the Colony may demand.
6. Had the change in questiontaken taken an opposite direction Mr Irving
would not have felt called on to tender and would doubtless have
resisted any claim for payment of the increased price.
7. All, I think, that could properly be conceded to Mr Irving is to
allow him to select 50 acres of his allotment for the £50 he has
actually paid, and to relieve him from his liability to complete the
rest of his contract.
Sir F. Rogers
It would be advisable to consult the Governor before adopting the
decision on Mr Irving's application suggested in this Report? There
are doubtless many purchasers of land in the Colony in the same
position as this Gentleman and all the cases should be treated alike?
Send, therefore, a copy of Mr I's letter to the Governor for report
(expressing the views of this Report as to what it would be proper to
concede) and inform Mr Irving that this has been done?
Elliot to John Irving, 10 October 1861, advising his application had
been referred to Douglas for comment and that a decision would
be made following receipt of the governor's report.
Draft reply, Newcastle to Douglas, No. 72, 9 October 1861,
forwarding a summary of Irving's complaint as well as Walcott's recommendation, and asking
for Douglas's opinion.