M Elliot
This half Yankee Assembly now expresses its con
V.C.I.n that
V.C.I. &
B.C. when united should have a regular parliamentary form of
Gov.
It had previously expressed its willingness to have any form of
Gov
wh: H.M.G. might think suitable.
As the first resolution of the Assembly on this subject has never
been ack it
w be somewhat inappropriate to ack the second. At
the same time I think the
Gov sh be apprized that this important
subject
is undergoing cons.
The Governor's ans (3 encl) to the Assembly respecting their
application for papers on the Union and Crown Lands questions is, I
think, very discreet, & entitled to approval.
M Seymour writes me that he will "really collect his papers" & send
in his report on the Union of the 2 Colonies.
This Resolution puts a difficulty, which did not exist before, in the
way of Union.
B. Columbia cannot yet have thoroughly representative institutions,
on account of it's
sparse and fluctuating population. On the other hand, if there
was a simple United Colony, one part could not be represented & the
other not.
"Responsible Gov"—so called—would be quite premature in either
of these half-formed Communities?