Despatch to London.
Minutes (6), Enclosures (untranscribed) (1), Other documents (3).
This document contains mentions of Indigenous Peoples. The authors of these documents
often perpetuate a negative perspective of Indigenous Peoples and it is important
to look critically at these mentions. They sometimes use terminology that is now considered
hurtful and offensive. To learn more about modern terminology pertaining to Indigenous
Peoples, Indigenous ways of knowing, and decolonization, please refer to the Glossary of terms.
With reference to the disturbances at Fort Yale, Douglas discusses at length the complexities and costs of employing and maintaining civic
and military protection for British Columbia, with concern that to rely on the present population would be to put the sword into the hands of Aliens who have no love for British institutions, and that The geographical position of British Columbia must be remembered in light of potential US incursions. At the end of the extensive minutes, Newcastle observes that Before long we must deal with the whole question of B. Columbia expenditure—Civil as well as Military—and to let the Govr in the meanwhile feel the
pressure of increasing debt is the best security for economy that we can enforce.
I have had the honor of receiving your Despatch No 48 of
the 11th April last, having reference to the disturbances which
occurred in January last at Fort Yale, and forwarding for my
information the copy of a letterletter from Lord Naas, with an enclosure
from the Chief Inspector of the Constabulary in Ireland relative
to the request made for a body of the Irish Constabulary to be sent
to British Columbia, & representing the necessity for further
information upon various points of detail mentioned.
2. I have given immediate attention to that matter, and have
the honor to forward herewith a statement which will supply the
information required.
3. With reference to your remarksremarks respecting the inability
of Her Majesty's Government to undertake the expense partially
or otherwise which the proposed Police Force would entail, I have
only to observe that, in such case, it will be advisable not to send
out the Force, as it is impossible to raise money in the Colony at
present to meet the expenditure that would thereby be incurred; and
moreover the Military force now in British Columbia, and the gradual
accession of a British population render the step every day less
a measuremeasure of necessary safety.
4. The population of British Columbia would, as you correctly
surmise, zealously come forward, if required, for their own
protection; but it has always appeared to me a most dangerous policy
to put the sword into the hands of Aliens who have no love for
British institutions, and who might turn it against the Government
whenever it suited their purpose. The geographical position of
British Columbia must be remembered, & it also must not be forgotten
that until lately British Subjects formed butbut a small portion of the
multitudes that poured into the Country, and although I firmly
believe that among the thousands of persons who have since departed
from the Colony scarcely one British Subject could be found, still
even in the population that remain the proportion of British
Subjects is far from being in the ascendant. The difficulties
attendant upon the employment of a volunteer force upon occasions
of emergency are consequently great; but apart from other considerations
there is one very grave objection which particularlyparticularly presents itself.
In a gold producing country men cannot and will not render their
services to the Government gratuitously, and the amount of recompense
they expect is exorbitant. Upon the occasion of the disturbances at
Fort Yale certain volunteers were employed by Colonel Moody. These
men cheerfully and most zealously afforded their Services, so much so
indeed as to call forth a warm letter of commendation from Colonel
Moody, but they demanded Five Dollars a day for their Services, and
as compensation for their lossloss of time, and, under the circumstances,
I was compelled to meet the demand. I am strongly inclined to believe
that as a measure of wise policy, and of sound economy, it is beyond
doubt advisable to employ none but British Subjects in protecting
British Territory.
5. I have read with due attention your remarks respecting the
provision to be made for the repayment by the Colony of the Advances
made from the Mother Country for the equipment and conveyance to
British Columbiaofof Colonel Moody's Party of Royal Engineers. The
Colony is most anxious to acquit herself of every obligation conferred
upon her, and she is quite capable of meeting all her civil
expenditures in a befitting and proper manner, but the cost of the
maintenance of the Military Force, with the heavy charge for Colonial
Pay, is at present more than her Finances can bear. The development
of the Country has been stayed for want of Funds, and the amount of
Revenue has in consequence fallen far short of my expectations. I
cannot refrainrefrain from remarking, however, that the expense of sending
the Royal Engineers to British Columbia, is a charge that can scarcely
with perfect justness be assigned to the Colony, seeing that after
all the object in view was one purely of an Imperial character.
But be that as it may, Her Majesty's Government must be lenient and
kind, and must until the Colony is in a condition to discharge her
liabilities, look for repayment in the acquisition of a magnificent
domain, which willwill give an expansion to British Trade and influence
in this part of the world that now can scarcely be sufficiently
appreciated, and which was unattainable by other means.
The idea of sending out an Irish Police Force will I suppose
now be abandoned. The Irish Office should in that case be so informed
with reference to their letter of 21 March last.
With regard to the Governor's appeal to be relieved from the
expenses of the Engineers—It was originally intended by Sir E. Lytton that those expenses should be, at any rate for a time borne by
this Country. (Despatch of 31 July 58.)
Afterwards in consequence of the favorable (but as they have
proved over estimated) accounts of the probable revenue of the Colony,
it was decided that the cost should be paid from the Colonial revenue.
(Despatch 2d Sept 58.)
It was however not intended that the regimental pay should be
thrown on the Colony (as clearly appears from Sir E. Lytton's letter
to the War Office of 10 November) but this has never been distinctly
explained to the Governor and may be stated and taken credit for in
writing to him now on the subject.
The remaining expenses of the expedition however were to fall on
the Colony. The Governor was instructed that they were to be made a
first charge on the land sales and that any sums disbursed by the
Imperial Treasury must be repaid. These instructions have been
constantly adhered to and reiterated in the despatches to Governor
Douglas.
Unfortunately the revenue has fallen far short of Governor
Douglas' Estimate , the Colony is unable to defray the annual cost of
the Engineers and a debt is rapidly accumulating (amounting already
to upwards of £40,000 and which will probably not be less than
£60,000 by the end of the current financial year) that must impede
the development of the Colony and the ultimate amount of which it
is not easy to foresee.
Under these circumstances it would seem a question whether it
is not necessary to revert to the original scheme of providing for
the cost of the Engineers from Imperial Funds until the Colonial
Revenue is able to bear the charge?
I would suggest therefore that the Governor be informed that the
Regimental Pay is intended to be defrayed by this Country—that a
copy of the Estimate taken for B. Columbia last session shd be
sent to him, pointing out that the amount of it is all that Parliament
has placed at the disposal of the Treasury for the use of B. Columbiasincesince the commencement of the Colony, conveying the decision which
the Duke of Newcastle may adopt as to the source from which the Col
Pay &c of the Engineers should be defrayed.
It is perfectly clear that the Colony cannot pay for the military
force, & that any attempt to make it do so can only end in disastrous
debt. The question lies between the "kind & lenient" policy advocated
by the Governor, and that of withdrawing almost all the military force
& leaving the Colony to take care of itself—which is what Col. Moody
has been lately indicating. There is no doubt this latter policy
requires firmness & nerve to follow, &, above all, that it cannot
be pursued unless we are determined to disregard the apprehensions
arising from the American character of the population. Probably the
experiment might be safely risked. But it is not to be forgotten,
that this corner of the world is becoming a very important point with
a view to foreign affairs. Indian hostilities & other causes have
established in Oregon a large detachment (relatively speaking) of the
small American army.
Self-defense is a principle sound in its character as applied to
a Colony in time of peace when the Colony is of British origin, but
there is much truth in the objection raised by the Govr that more
than one half of the Inhabitants even now are foreigners & he might
have added belong to the Country from which in case of disturbance
there would be most cause for apprehension.
I am not disposed to withdraw the very moderate Military Force
which is at present assigned to British Columbia, but on the other hand I think it would be premature to give the Govr any assurance
of relief from any portion of the expense except the Regimental Pay.
In gold-producing Countries events march rapidly & changes from
wealth to poverty or the reverse are affairs of months instead of years.
Before long we must deal with the whole question of B. Columbia
expenditure—Civil as well as Military—and to let the Govr in the meanwhile feel the pressure of increasing debt is the best security for economy
that we can enforce.
Draft, Colonial Office to Under-Secretary for War, 10 September 1859, forwarding copy of
the despatch and draft reply and asking that they be shown to
Sidney Herbert for concurrence.
Draft, Colonial Office to Under-Secretary for the Home Office, 4
October 1859, advising it was not considered expedient to send
any of the Irish Constabulary to British Columbia.
Minutes by CO staff
The papers with the minute for this draft are in circn just now.
Draft reply, Newcastle to Douglas, No. 24, 23 September 1859, noting that "it was never the intention of Her Majesty's Government to throw the
entire cost of this military force on the colony," and expressing confidence that
the colony will for itself "provide for this portion of its expenditure within a reasonable
time."
Minutes by CO staff
Duke of Newcastle
For approval. The desp. appears to require some answer;
& I am not certain whether this expresses your view?
It will meet my view perfectly. I wish to keep the Govr
"up to the collar" as to the economy till we can deal with the whole
question of expenditure—wh I hope will be soon.