M Elliot
This despatch is satisfactory as regards
M Crease. But
the question remains whether, adverting to the Governor's
observation in 5766—of
22 April, respecting the inutility of an Attorney General for
B. Columbia unless he resides in
V. Couver Island, where there is already an Attorney G. anybody at all
sh be nominated to that situation in
B. Columbia. But
perhaps the
Duke of Newcastle may regard this
desp as
sufficiently conclusive as to the necessity of a separate
apptment for
B. Columbia.
M Fortescue
If there be any grounds of doubt on filling up this appointment
it seems to me that they must be reduced to two.
First, ought the Attorney General for
Vancouver Island to be
asked to do the duty also for
British Columbia, giving him perhaps
a small extra salary? I daresay that it would be economical to
combine many of the Offices for these two Colonies: but they have
not in point of fact been combined, and have on the contrary
advisedly been kept separate, and I do not think, therefore that
you could make the Attorney General the single exception.
Secondly, is the residence of the officer
at
Vancouver Island
proof that he cannot be wanted to advise upon the affairs of
British Columbia? This is the point put by
M Blackwood. I
think that it is not proof, because of course it is the Governor
who wants a legal adviser, and who must naturally wish to find him
at his side.
I anticipate therefore that the appointment will be filled up.
In that case the question for the
Duke of Newcastle will be whether
he will bestow it on
M Crease, who is favorably described by the
Governor, or whether his Grace desires to send out any one from
home.