Seymour discusses the positive and negative aspects of selecting Victoria or New Westminster as the capital of the united colony of British Columbia, adding particular attention to the government house in each city. In the discussion,
Seymour reflects on factors such as population, trade, current infrastructure, and political
stability. Seymour promises further correspondence on the subject after reviewing a newly received despatch
from October 1st. Minutes by Cox, Rogers, and Adderley discuss whether Seymour will send another report and, from the current despatch, whether to conclude Victoria will be the new capital.
No. 161
10th December 1867
My Lord Duke,
I have had the honor to receive Your Grace's despatch No. 49
of the 17th of August respecting certain resolutions passed
by the Legislative Council in favor of theSeat Seat of Government of
the Colony being established at Victoria. The schedule of
despatches received by your Grace, which came by the same mail
shows me that my communication No. 87 of 13th July, on this
subject is already before you.
Recd on the 31st Aug.
2. The question is one really of very great difficulty in
the present depressed condition of the Colony. Were either
Victoria or NewWestminsterWestminster prosperous it would matter but little
where the Governor had his abode and where the Legislative
Council met.
3. New Westminster was proclaimed the Capital of British
Columbia. Vancouver Island prayed and agitated for admission on any
terms into an union with the Mainland Colony. Hence it would seem but
natural that New Westminster shouldbe be the Capital of the United Colony.
Victoria however, previous to the separation of the Colonies, was
virtually the Capital of both and, as I have already stated in my
despatch above referred to, had concentrated many powerful influences.
4. If I be permitted to set aside the consideration of Sir
James Douglas's Proclamation and the apparent deviation from good
faith towardsthe the purchasers of town lots in New Westminster I
would state the case as follows:
5. Victoria has the largest population, the richest shopkeepers,
the largest Church endowments, the greatest trade and is singularly
favored by the Head Quarters of the Pacific Squadron being placed in
the neighbouring harbour of Esquimalt. It is also unquestionably the
mostconvenient convenient place for communicating, if desirable, with the
United States Authorities at San Francisco or Alaska. It has certain
Public Offices of good appearance but I am informed by Major General
Moody RE, of the most unsatisfactory construction. Victoria posseses
additionally a Government House of some pretension, built at a cost
of about £9,000 at the time when the Colony could notmeet meet its
indebtedness. This house is large and unfurnished but being situated
amongst rocks so disposed as to keep off the Sun and not the cold
breezes of the Straits, it is singularly unattractive. The walls
have no paper to hide the cracks which the settlement of the older
portions of the building
have entailed upon them. There is no water on the grounds in
summer, all for consumption has to be purchased.
6. New
6. New Westminster has on the other hand the disadvantage of
being more out of the way of Foreign Callers, and being less connected
with Her Majesty's Navy. It is away from the Head Quarters of the
Hudson's Bay Company's Establishments, and from the abodes of the
principal merchants of the Colony. Its Public Offices are inferior
and if there be, as seems to be supposed in Victoria, anecessary necessary
connection between trade and Government, New Westminster must yield
the palm to the older city. Here however the Government House is a
cottage without pretension on the Banks of the Fraser. It is a modest
English house nicely furnished, in a lovely situation, and abundantly
supplied with water. I can hardly imagine a Governor of his own free
will leaving it for the more ambitiousbuilding building at Victoria which fails
to supply one of the necessaries of comfort after an outlay of three
times as much as the house from which I now write, has cost.
7. It is held in certain petitions which have been presented to
Your Grace, and to which I shall refer in a separate despatch, that the
seat of Government should be where the population is most concentrated.
Yetsuch such is not the opinion in the neighbouring States. Washington
has not the trade or bustle of New York. Sacramento is insignificant
as a settlement compared with San Francisco. I might go the round of the
States by name and shew that the deliberative and Executive Government
are removed from the great bustling and excitable centres of population.
Our, to us here, EasternColonies Colonies, seem to have followed the same
principle. Ottawa has not the trade of Quebec or Montreal.
Fredericton that of St Johns.
8. As regards the political question connected with the seat
of Government for British Columbia I would observe that I never saw a
community more politically excitable and tempest torn than that of
Victoria.
Your Grace'spredecessors predecessors will have had but too great knowledge of
the mode in which matters were conducted under the late Legislative
Constitution of Vancouver Island. Under that at present existing
people are quieter but I do not think that the Council would be as
much able to do their duty to the Community at large when sitting in
the feverish political atmosphere ofVictoriaVictoria as if deliberating in
the less troubled town of New Westminster.
9. If however we consider the question merely as how to please
immediately the greater number of persons the selection of Victoria
as a capital would be the most advisable.
9. [sic] I had written thus far when I received Your Grace's
despatch No. 67of of the 1st October. The matter to which it
refers shall have my most careful consideration and I shall reply
to it by the next opportunity.
I have the honor to be,
My Lord Duke,
Your most obedient
humble Servant. Frederick Seymour
Minutes by CO staff
Sir F. Rogers
See 2630. If the best Govt House was to decide the question
there could be no doubt as to the Capital. Wait for promised report?
Yes—for a single mail. It is clear, I think, that he cannot mean
No 165 to be the report promised in this dph. But if no further
report arrived, I shd be disposed to assume that he did, & to
settle the question here in favour of Victoria.