Sir F. Sandford
I do not think this vote could have been included in the
1869
Estimates for they were sent from the Colony in the beginning of
March. The Report of the Committee
w the Bishop sends is
dated
10 Feb, & the Col Sec letter
21 June 69. He states
"special allowance will be made for this sum in future remittances."
The question was probably left in arrear by
M Seymour & has
since been taken up by
M Hankin.
It should however be reported & provision must be made for the
amount in the Col Estimates.
M Musgraves reply to the S of S despatch
of
5 Aug may reach this office about the
Middle of Oct?
The Bishop says any delay would cause great disappointment &
that a shipfull of Emigrants is likely to sail in Oct for
w reasons he asks for the advance.
If it were not for the
Minutes on 8223 I should be inclined to
recommend that his Lordships request
sh be complied with & the
Gov informed.
I think we have now sufficient evidence in this report to
warrant our allowing the
Crown Agents to make the payment of
£400 requested by the Colonial Secretary. The Bishop called to
report the extent to which he had proceeded in the matter
(believing that he had sufficient authority) & the extreme
inconvenience wh:
w be occasioned by any delay. He has
engaged a
lot of female Servants who are under contract to
serve certain families for 2 years—repaying part of their
passage money out of their wages—which are fixed at about £40 a year.
? allow—but point out a want of formality in proceedings to
the Governor.