Farrer discusses the bonding system in the Californian Ports, and requests that Newcastle refer Douglas to Hammond's letter on the subject, in order to clarify apparent contradictions in duty-collection
systems between California ports and Vancouver Island.
Office of Committee of Privy Council for Trade
Whitehall
25 August 1859
I am directed by the Lords of the Committee of Privy Council for
Trade to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 23d August
Instant transmitting for their information, by direction of the Duke
of Newcastle, a copy of a letter from the Foreign Department on the
subject of the bonding system in the Californian Ports, with respect
to which My Lords suggested in their letter of the 12th July last
that an enquiry should be made.
It appears from this letter thatthat Mr Booker the British Consul at San Francisco has reported to Lord John Russell that the bonding system
does exist in those Ports, the Importer being, however, obliged to
enter into bonds for the payment of the Import Duty, or for the
Export of the goods within three years.
My Lords are unable to reconcile this statement with that contained
in the 6th paragraph of Governor Douglas's Despatch of the 23d
March last transmitted to this Department in Mr Fortescue's letter
of the 28th June which is to the effect that goods imported into
Vancouver's Island from thethe Californian Ports are
necessarily burdened with the Customs and Municipal duties levied in
California, forming a charge of nearly 30 per cent on their first
cost.
I am therefore to request that you will suggest to the Duke of
Newcastle that Mr Hammond's letter should be referred to Governor
Douglas with a view to obtain an explanation of the apparent
discrepancy in the two statements to which I have adverted.