No. 56
3 December 1862
I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your Despatch of the 24h September last marked "Separate" calling my attention to the occasional omission in the Colonial enactments sent home by this Government, of the marginal abstracts required by establishedrule,Manuscript image rule to facilitate their examination.
2. The cost of printing in this Colony is very great, and I find that with the view to economize as much as possible, the practice of placing the abstract of the clause over the clause, instead of in the margin, was introduced. I will, however, take care that in future the established rule be strictly adhered to.
I have the honor to be
My Lord Duke
Your Grace's most obedient
and humble Servant
James Douglas
Minutes by CO staff
Manuscript image
ABd 31 Jany
TFE 31 Jan[uar]y
Manuscript image
Answer that it is perfectly immaterial whether the running summary of V.C.I. Acts is printed at the head of the separate clauses or in the margin—but point out to Govr Douglas that in many of the V.C.I. Acts it is not inserted either in the one place or in the other.
Draft at once.
At once.
CF 4
Other documents included in the file
Manuscript image
Draft reply, Newcastle to Douglas, No. 5, 12 February 1863.
Douglas, James to Pelham-Clinton, Henry Pelham Fiennes 3 December 1862, CO 305:19, no. 1010, 287. The Colonial Despatches of Vancouver Island and British Columbia 1846-1871, Edition 2.2, ed. James Hendrickson and the Colonial Despatches project. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria.

Last modified: 2020-12-02 13:40:34 -0800 (Wed, 02 Dec 2020) (SVN revision: 5008)