Franks discusses his appointment and removal from office in British Columbia and Franks’s decision to not accept A gratuity of two month's Salary [and] An offer of one hundred pounds.Franks asks that the rule of the Colonial Office not be applied in Franks’s case and solicits further employment with the Colonial Office. Elliot’s minute advises gathering information regarding Franks’s conduct and reputation in Franks’s late post. The included document relates why Franks’s lost his office in British Columbia.
The copy letter herewith will make known to Your Grace the
reason of my departure from that Colony.
In reply to that letter I addressed a respectful protest to the
Governor against the abolition—so far as it concerned myself
individually—of an Office to which I was appointed by Her Majesty,
and which, when I accepted it, I had every reason to believe
conferred upon me for life.
In a private note, dated 23d December, Mr Seymour says
"Your protest I think very good, and I am forwarding a copy to Lord
Carnarvon."
It appears however that, although Despatches have been received
upto the to the 31st Jany last, no correspondence on this, or any
other point connected with the abolition of My office has been
received at the Colonial Office.
I was appointed to the Treasurership in April 1864, and I
assumed the duties of that Office on my arrival in the Colony on the
26th of August in that year.
I have drawn my Salary up to the 31st of December 1866.
According to the rule of the Colonial Office, officers whose
Salaries are above £500 per annum are not entitled to an allowance
for passage money, and I defrayed my expenses to the most distant of
Her Majesty's Colonies out of my own pocket.
I have
I have further defrayed out of my own pocket the expenses of my
passage to England.
I have not received, in any form whatever, gratuity or
compensation for the very heavy outlay I incurred on accepting and
relinquishing my appointment. A gratuity of two month's Salary was
offered to me—but I declined it on the ground that it was wholly
inadequate. An offer of one hundred pounds was made to me for the
expenses of my passage home: but I declined this also, on the ground
that the passage money fixed by the Crown Agents was one hundred and
fifty pounds, and that one hundred pounds was insufficient to cover
the cost. I have kept an account of my expensesand they and they show a
total of £122.
I would therefore beg leave respectfully to submit to Your Grace
that, in view of the short period during while I have received the
Emoluments of my Office, the rule of the Colonial Office which
disentitles Officers in my position to passage money cannot
reasonably be held to apply—and to request that Your Grace will be
pleased to direct that the usual amount be paid to me by the Crown
Agents for my passage out to the Colony, as well as for my passage home.
With regard to any gratuity or compensation to which I may be
deemed entitledon on account of other expenses out of pocket, or the
hardship inflicted upon me by the abolition of my life appointment, I
am led to believe that it is considered impossible to deal with the
matter prior to the receipt of Despatches from British Columbia.
But I would, in the meantime, take this occasion of expressing
to Your Grace my hope that the abolition—for no other than reasons
of State—of the office I have lately held, may be considered in a
light favourable to the further employment which I have now the
honour to solicit at Your Grace's hands.
I have the honour to be
My Lord Duke,
Your Grace's most obedient Servant Charles W. Franks
Mr Elliot
I pass this Letter on at once; but I abstain from Minuting it on this
occasion as some papers to which it is necessary to refer, are in the
hands of the printer, & will not, I understand, be at liberty for a
few days.
In consequence not merely of the Union of the two Colonies but of
financial difficulties which would at all events have made large
reductions indispensable, Mr Franks's Office has been abolished.
He
He refused the usual gratuity which was offered him in the
Colony of one month's salary for each year's service. He refused the
sum of £100 which was offered him for his passage. And whatever
decision may be taken on those points in England, he hopes that his
loss of his Office by no fault will be considered a claim to
reemployment.
Before giving him fresh employment, it would perhaps be deemed
advisable to ascertain what information there may be as to his
conduct and reputation in his late post.
For the present I suppose that his letter can only receive a
very general acknowledgement.
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
A.N. Birch to Franks, 22 November 1866, advising that his office
would be abolished in consequence of the union of the colonies and
the present state of the finances.