Douglas writes Newcastle in response to Langford's complaints. He defends the
appointment of Cameron as Chief Justice of Vancouver's Island, claiming that he is
much respected throughout the Colony, and points out that Langford's allegations of misconduct against
Pemberton were found to be untrue.
No. 44
23 August 1862
I have the honor to acknowledge receipt of Your Grace's Despatch No
101 of the 2nd June last, referring for report copy of letters from
Mr E.E. Langford, formerly a resident of Vancouver's Island,
containing complaints against certain of the Officersconnected connected with
my Government; & I have also the honor to acknowledge receipt of Your
Grace's Despatch No 106, of the 19th June, transmitting, for the
same purpose, copy of a further letter of complaint from Mr Langford
upon the same subject.
2. I have in accordance with Your Graces instructions called upon
the officers concerned for any remarks they may have to offer in
respect of the allegations of Mr Langford, and so soon as I receive
their replies I will forward them to Your Grace with such report
thereon as the circumstances of the case may require. MrBegbieBegbie,
the Judge of British Columbia, one of the gentlemen inculpated by
Mr Langford, is absent on Circuit, and by last Accounts was at
Carribou, it may therefore be some time before I can hear from him.
3. With respect to the latter portion of your Despatch of the 2nd June, which refers especially to Mr Cameron the Chief Justice of
Vancouver's Island, I will take an early opportunity of placing
before Your Grace all the circumstances in connection with the
appointment of MrCameronCameron. I may however at present maintain that
so far as I am aware Mr Cameron performs his duties with much
ability, and his decisions give general satisfaction. Individually I
believe him to be much respected throughout the Colony. The
allegations of Mr Langford in regard to the administration of
justice in Vancouver's Island I have no hesitation in at once
pronouncing to be unfounded. I hear for the first time that "the
proceedings in the Law Courts of the Colony are the theme ofscorn scorn
and derision amongst the Colonists." Had such a state of things
existed I must have known it; and I think I should, in such case, long
ago have put an end to it. I did indeed once receive a letter of
complaint against Mr Cameron from Mr Langford, and in that he
asserted that "Life and Liberty had been illegally sacrificed and
jeopardized and the ends of Justice defeated"—but as the allegation
was merely a general one, and as I found on inquiry that just at that
time Mr Langford had beenvery very properly committed by Mr Cameron
for a gross contempt of Court, the cause of this letter as well as
its object was so evident, that—anxious as I may be that no just
complaint should go unnoticed—I yet felt that in this case it would
be most inexpedient for me to interfere.
4. Mr Langford is the same person who brought the complaint against
Mr Pemberton the Colonial Surveyor General, for unjust, partial, and
improper conduct in respect of the sale of some Land, which complaint
I forwarded to your Grace in my DespatchNo No 14 of the 23rd March 1860. Mr Pemberton was fully exonerated from the charge as will be
seen by the Secretary of State's Despatch No 28 of the 26th July 1860. I would respectfully request your Grace's attention to both
these Despatches, as serving to give some insight into Mr Langford's
character, and to throw some light upon his present proceedings.
I have the honor to be
My Lord Duke
Your Grace's most obedient
and humble Servant James Douglas