I have to report, for the information of 
M Secretary Cardwell, the
               steps we have taken to carry out your oral instructions to have
               engrossed and executed the Deed of Grant for endowing Christ Church,
               
Victoria, in 
Vancouver Island.
               
               2. On the day after we received from you the Draft Deed for
               engrossment we applied to 
Mess Maynard and Son, the Solicitors of
               the 
Hudsons Bay C (who are made parties to the Deed for the purpose
               of conveying the legal Estate

 of the Land) to fix a time for the
               execution of the Deed.
               
               3. We then learned that the Company had not yet seen the Deed, and
               that it was necessary that the Draft should be left with them for the
               purpose of verifying the description of the Land and the plan of the
               premises. The Draft was accordingly left with 
Mess Maynard and
               Son on the 
7 ultimo. On the 
17 we wrote to 
M Maynard to
               request its return, and were informed that the Company wished it to
               be seen by 
M McTavish, their representative at 
Victoria, who
               happened to be in this Country, but was not then in 
London. On the
               
1 instant we wrote to the

 Secretary of the Company to urge the
               matter on, and on the 4 we were informed in reply that 
M
                  McTavish was then in France but expected back on the 
8 and that on
               his return the transaction should be completed as soon as possible.
               
M Fraser, the Secretary of the Company, added, that the only cause
               for the delay was the wish of 
M McTavish to have an opportunity of
               examining the Draft and the Map attached to it, before the Deed was
               signed on behalf of the Company. Not hearing further on the subject
               we again wrote on the 
19 instant to 
M Fraser a letter of
               reminder, and received from him a reply dated the 
27. Copies of
               the correspondence with the Company

 are enclosed.
               
               4. From 
M Fraser's last letter it will be seen that the Company
               have no objection to the deed. Indeed unless there had been some
               error in the description of the Lands they could have no objection to
               it, since it only completed an arrangement which they had sanctioned
               and commenced. At the last moment, however, they have shifted their
               ground, and started a difficulty with which we are incapable of
               dealing. They decline it seems to part with the legal Estate in the
               lands in question until the Colonial Authorities are prepared to
               carry out in its integrity the Agreement between the

 Crown and the
               Company of the 
3 Febry 1862, thus using their fiduciary power in
               one transaction to enforce a settlement of their Land Claims in another.
               
               
               
                  
                     
                     See S.S. desp 20 Aug 1863—wh is unanswered at this date.
                     
                  
                
               
               
               6. As we were aware that an early termination of the matter was
               desired by the 
Bishop of Columbia and as there was no reason to
               anticipate any objection to the measure on the part of the Company, to
               save time we had the Deed engrossed

 for signature. We enclose it
               herewith together with the Draft which we received from you.