M Herbert
The Governor has in the main fulfilled in a satisfactory manner
the Instructions given by
Lord Granville's despatch N 86,
Aug
18/69 (dft in 21/8153/67
B. Columbia, herewith)
with respect to the form of submitting the annual Estimates, but
he has, somewhat inaccurately, lost sight of the very first &
most distinct of these Instructions: "I have to instruct you in
the first place not to separate
in future the Appropriation
Ordinances & the Estimates on which they are founded." Last
year the Appropriation Ordinance was sent from the Colony on the
19 March, & the Estimates not till the
24 June. Now we
receive the Estimates first, & there is as yet no Ordinance.
The Governor sh , I presume, be again informed that the annual
Estimates & Appropriation Ordinance sh be sent together.
It is satisfactory to find that there was no foundation for
Governor Seymour's off-hand
dictum
(see para: 2 of
L Granville's despatch of
Aug 18/69 already
quoted) that the printed Instructions to the Straits, enclosed
to him as a guide,
'were not applicable to B. Columbia.'
They are now found to be applicable in almost every particular,
& we here have a totally complete collection of the prescribed
statements. 1. Estimates. 2. Assets & Liabilities for
Jan 1/69
&
Dec 31/69. 3. Cash Transactions for
1869 (
Jan to 31 Dec).
4. Table
of Laws or Ordinances, constituting the authority for
the Expenditure estimated (the number of the Appropriation Ordinance
for
1870 is left blank, in the table sent—I suppose
because it has not been passed). 5. Report of Auditor General on
the financial arrangements.
It will, however, be advisable, I think, to point out that the
following are defects which sh be remedied on future occasions.
(1) The returns here submitted of Assets & Liabilities, include
the permanent Debts & sinking fund. This is erroneous. The
floating or temporary debt sh no doubt appear among the
liabilities, but permanent debt & in like manner Sinking fund
sh be given in a separate statement, as pointed out towards
the end of para: 2 of the printed despatch to the Straits (see
the enclosure with dft desp of Aug 18/69 herewith).
(2) The
detail in the Estimates
does not extend (as far as I see) to the
Expenditure for civil Establishments sanctioned by permanent
Laws (Governor's & other salaries). Only the
lump amounts under these Laws appear to be given in the Estimates.
I think it
sh be observed to the Governor, that the Estimates
sh set out in detail the entire proposed Expenditure for the
year, at the same time that they distinguish (as is of course
proper,) what has been voted by permanent Law from what will
rest on the annual Appropriation Ordinance.
In giving these suggested instructions to remedy defects,
Lord
Granville will I presume express much satisfaction with the very
great improvement which
Governor Musgrave has effected in the
mode of submitting the finance arrangements for the year.
(Last
year we
rec the Appropriation Ordinance & Estimates literally
under envelopes, without a syllable of explanation).
Looking at the extract of
the Treasury letter of
Feb 3/70, to
this office, annexed to Agents/1333/70 (
Jan 31/70), I
conclude there is hardly any occasion to communicate these
papers to
the Treasury, or if this is necessary, I suppose it
sh be done only by enclosing
for Treas information copies of the Governor's
desp &
enclosures, & of the proposed reply, when sent off, with a
[hith?] Form.
I have had little to do with
B. Columbia financial affairs
beyond the question of forms of statement, & am therefore not
a good judge of the merits of the Estimates, but I do not myself
observe any ground for disapproving them. It will, however, be
proper to observe, in writing to the Governor,
to the effect
above suggested—that
Lord Granville postpones sanctioning the
Estimates till he receives the Appropriation Ordinance, shewing
that they have been adopted by the Legisl Council.