This is a case in which we have some cause to complain of
                     inattention to a very plain duty, although we cannot at this
                     distance tell who is in fault. The grant of the land of 
Vanc. I. to the 
HBCo. expressly provides that "the Company shall
                     reserve for the use of us our heirs &c all such land as may be
                     required for the formation of naval establishments, we paying a
                     reasonable price for the same." 
Thetis Island according to this
                     report was so "required" and ought to have been so purchased.
                     But I suppose the naval officers on the station preferred using
                     it without paying for it & trusting to the chapter of accidents.
                     Now they complain that the land has been sold: but on what
                     possible ground? I do not suppose the Surveyor could refuse to
                     sell land claimed by nobody. 
Gov. Douglas's suggestion that the
                     Adm had better trust to "possession" is very public
                     
                     spirited, but I am not sure what 
M Nagle the purchaser might
                     say to it. Point out this to the Adm? & ask the 
Gov for a
                     report. Also communicate to the 
HBC, but I do not see how they
                     can help us.